Showing posts with label modernism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label modernism. Show all posts

Monday, February 9, 2009

Lecture 6: Professor Andrew Hugill on Music and Digital Culture

On Monday the 16th of Feb., Professor Andrew Hugill will take you on a tour of music modernism, postmodernism, structuralism, minimalism with a culmination in the digital culture.

Professor Hugill has created a list of reading/listening that you might like to do before the lecture: http://www.mti.dmu.ac.uk/~ahugill/music/masters/


Instead of preparing reading for the next lecture I've asked that you each write a blog response to Prof. Hugill's lecture. Some things to include:

  • Title: Lecture 6: Music and Digital Culture, Name
  • Summary of the lecture and how it fits in with the theories/ideas we've been looking at
  • An image that you have taken during the lecture, either of the group working or perhaps of Prof. Hugill speaking
  • A question to Prof. Hugill. Perhaps after the lecture you have a question about what he said, or maybe you'd like more examples of music to listen to, or even a clearer link of how musical interpretations/theory align with what we've already covered


Do take a look at Professor Hugill's recent book, The Digital Musician. It's available on Amazon and some parts are readable via google.




Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Week 2 - Modernism


Today's discussion grew out of the assigned readings which included Borges' "Pierre Menard," Benjamin's "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction," and John Lechte's Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Postmodernity.



I jotted (on a laptop of course) as the discussion evolved:


  • Why is "aura" important to Benjamin?
  • Situate Benjamin within the climate in which he was working; modernist artists and composers were beginning to talk about defining aspects of the time including a look to the future, the importance of originality, universal concepts (grand narratives). One such believer in universality was Le Corbusier:


"If I hold up a primary cubic form, I release in each individual the same primary sensation of the cube; but if Iplace some black geometric spots on the cube, I immediately release in a civilised man an idea of dice to play with, and a whole series of associations which would follow. A Papuan would see only an ornament." (1920)


  • In other words, it seems Le Corbusier believes one can strip away cultural context in order to reveal only the surface meaning. This is, according to Le Corbusier because everyone "reads" primary forms in the same way.


~~~


  • Does abstraction imply a stripping away of cultural significance?


~~~


  • Without art in the world what would happen? Does art have a "utility" value? (Think of Malevich's Suprematist Composition: Red Square and Black Square)



Reading for next week:

Roland Barthes, Image/Music/Text, "Death of the Author" essay, and Mythologies

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Ludwig Wittgenstein

Lev Manovich's The Language of New Media


Task: research the concept "literacy."

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Leading To Modernism...

Put your thinking caps on:



"Does a number have a context?"